YES 0.706 H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/Monad.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:



HASKELL
  ↳ BR

mainModule Monad
  ((msum :: [[a]]  ->  [a]) :: [[a]]  ->  [a])

module Monad where
  import qualified Maybe
import qualified Prelude

  class Monad a => MonadPlus a where 
    mplus :: MonadPlus a => a b  ->  a b  ->  a b
mzero :: MonadPlus a => a b

  instance MonadPlus Maybe where 

instance MonadPlus [] where 
   
mplus (++)
mzero []

  msum :: MonadPlus b => [b a ->  b a
msum foldr mplus mzero


module Maybe where
  import qualified Monad
import qualified Prelude



Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.

↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
HASKELL
      ↳ COR

mainModule Monad
  ((msum :: [[a]]  ->  [a]) :: [[a]]  ->  [a])

module Maybe where
  import qualified Monad
import qualified Prelude


module Monad where
  import qualified Maybe
import qualified Prelude

  class Monad a => MonadPlus a where 
    mplus :: MonadPlus a => a b  ->  a b  ->  a b
mzero :: MonadPlus a => a b

  instance MonadPlus Maybe where 

instance MonadPlus [] where 
   
mplus (++)
mzero []

  msum :: MonadPlus a => [a b ->  a b
msum foldr mplus mzero



Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
undefined 
 | False
 = undefined

is transformed to
undefined  = undefined1

undefined0 True = undefined

undefined1  = undefined0 False



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ COR
HASKELL
          ↳ Narrow

mainModule Monad
  (msum :: [[a]]  ->  [a])

module Monad where
  import qualified Maybe
import qualified Prelude

  class Monad a => MonadPlus a where 
    mplus :: MonadPlus a => a b  ->  a b  ->  a b
mzero :: MonadPlus a => a b

  instance MonadPlus Maybe where 

instance MonadPlus [] where 
   
mplus (++)
mzero []

  msum :: MonadPlus a => [a b ->  a b
msum foldr mplus mzero


module Maybe where
  import qualified Monad
import qualified Prelude



Haskell To QDPs


↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ COR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ Narrow
            ↳ AND
QDP
                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_psPs(:(vy300, vy301), vy4, h) → new_psPs(vy301, vy4, h)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:



↳ HASKELL
  ↳ BR
    ↳ HASKELL
      ↳ COR
        ↳ HASKELL
          ↳ Narrow
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
QDP
                ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

new_foldr(:(vy30, vy31), h) → new_foldr(vy31, h)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: